NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 948 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12190 vs 10465
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62409 vs 39269
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 vs 183.81
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 vs 2637.997
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 vs 13.059
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 vs 160.359
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 vs 688.388
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 10 November 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 948 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12190 vs 10465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62409 vs 39269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 vs 183.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 vs 2637.997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 vs 13.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 vs 160.359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 vs 688.388 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 452 vs 441
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 vs 441 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Tesla M40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12190 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 452 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62409 | 39269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | 183.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | 2637.997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | 13.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | 160.359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 | 688.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | GM200 |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 10 November 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 247 | 264 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 948 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |