NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 and NVIDIA Tesla P40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1531 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12585 vs 12190
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 441
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 9538
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 9538
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1531 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12585 vs 12190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 9538 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 8,873 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 9016 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62453 vs 52705
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 vs 223.558
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 vs 2698.914
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 vs 14.206
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 vs 140.845
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 vs 927.006
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3077
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3077
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 8,873 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 9016 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62453 vs 52705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 vs 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 vs 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 vs 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 vs 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 vs 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3077 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12585 | 12190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52705 | 62453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP102 |
Launch date | 1 October 2016 | 13 September 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | $5,699 |
Place in performance rating | 244 | 246 |
Price now | $1,699.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 11,758 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3840 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |