NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla S1075 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla S1075
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 610 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 4x 48.8 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 3.8x more pipelines: 4x 240 vs 2x 128
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 4x 622.1 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4x 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
Launch date | 1 June 2008 vs 18 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 610 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 48.8 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4x 240 vs 2x 128 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 622.1 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4x 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 226 Watt vs 800 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 226 Watt vs 800 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla S1075
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Name | NVIDIA Tesla S1075 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4196 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4196 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G92 |
Launch date | 1 June 2008 | 18 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 472 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 622.1 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 240 | 2x 128 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 48.8 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 800 Watt | 226 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 4 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 102.4 GB / s | 2x 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4x 512 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |