NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Tesla T4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1515 MHz
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 590
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 127.622
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1781
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1781

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4

• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10744 vs 10167
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 55741
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1961.932
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 11.169
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 109.29
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 787.025
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 13569
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 13569

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10167 10744
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	750 590
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55741 61276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.014 127.622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961.932 3026.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.169 18.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.29 119.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	787.025 910.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1781
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1781

Compare specifications (specs)