NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 55407
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 2036.763
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 14.035
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 27.417
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 819.934
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 11173
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 11173
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 27 May 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 55407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 11173 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15554 versus 10751
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 versus 594
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 127.622
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 1781
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15554 versus 10751 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 versus 594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 127.622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10751 | 15554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 594 | 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 55407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7546 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 27 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 268 | 265 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 10 GB/s |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |