NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 602 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 11.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 vs 947
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 vs 454
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 vs 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 vs 454 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | TU104 | GT200B |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 264 | 315 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 602 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 1,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |