NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 14076
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 14076
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1781
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1781
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1781 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective)
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 44354
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 44354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44354 | 61276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10684 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Code name | GP104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 13 September 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 271 | 272 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 111.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) | 10000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P5200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
