NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla T4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1515 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 127.622
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 119.936
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1781
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1781

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 vs 9962
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 vs 476
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 56976
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 2138.158
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 16.498
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 729.947
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 12750
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 12750

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9962 10909
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 596
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	56976 61276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	202.984 127.622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138.158 3026.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.498 18.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.433 119.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	729.947 910.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12750 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 1781
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12750 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 1781

Compare specifications (specs)