NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla T4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 127.622
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 1976
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 1781
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 1976
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 1781

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4

• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10684 vs 7542
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 592 vs 383
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 42000
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1843.045
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 10.681
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 115.607
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 644.098
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 12180
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7542 10684
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 592
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	42000 61276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 127.622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 3026.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 18.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 119.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 910.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 1781
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 1781

Compare specifications (specs)