NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10000 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19862 vs 10616
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 vs 592
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 147317 vs 61276
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 127.622
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3026.812
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 18.798
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 119.936
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 910.721
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 14076
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 1976
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 vs 1781
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 14076
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 1976
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 vs 1781
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 10000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19862 vs 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 vs 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 147317 vs 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 vs 1781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | 19862 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 880 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 147317 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 270 | 96 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 14000 MHz |