NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 441.6 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2048
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 14,131 gflops vs 4,096 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11451 vs 9603
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11451 vs 9603
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12633 vs 6209
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 June 2017 vs 8 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops vs 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11451 vs 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11451 vs 9603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12633 vs 6209 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3555
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3198
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3198
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 685 vs 515
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3198 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 685 vs 515 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166109 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11451 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11451 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3555 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3555 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3198 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3198 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 685 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12633 | 6209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GV100 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 21 June 2017 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 209 | 379 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1246 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |