NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
• Around 82% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 2816
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 5,914 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 9437
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 114.288
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 2911.861
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 vs 10.947
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 vs 683.568
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 vs 11675
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 vs 11675

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X

• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 vs 406
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 73.167

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16235 9437
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	406 820
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	500.053 114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7209.392 2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.826 10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.167 118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1253.829 683.568
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16337 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16337 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3350

Compare specifications (specs)