NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1530 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 438.4 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 82% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 2816
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 14,029 gflops versus 5,914 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 67% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1752 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 versus 9443
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 114.288
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 2911.861
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 10.947
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 versus 683.568
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 versus 11675
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 versus 11675
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 June 2017 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1530 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 2816 |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops versus 5,914 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 versus 9443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 versus 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 406
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 versus 73.167
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 versus 73.167 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 | 9443 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180318 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.167 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Volta | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GV100 | Grenada |
| Date de sortie | 21 June 2017 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 135 | 279 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $429 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1530 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1312 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 2816 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 21,100 million | 6,200 million |
| Unités de Compute | 44 | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 512 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB avec des autres
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
IntelArc Pro A60
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
