AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4300 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 531
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.153 vs 57.354
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3688
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3356
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3688
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2978 vs 2798
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11724 vs 11008
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 31.528
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 828.57
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 2.986
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 152.484
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 vs 3572
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 vs 3572

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2798 2978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	601 531
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11008 11724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.528 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	828.57 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.986 3.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.153 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.484 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3572 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6161 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17597 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3572 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6161 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17597 3356

Compare specifications (specs)