AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 112.0 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 3,584 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6337 vs 2809
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 625
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30243 vs 11008
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.958 vs 31.528
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1070.209 vs 828.57
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.94 vs 2.986
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 59.153
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 152.484
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7664 vs 3572
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7664 vs 3572

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 2340
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3351
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 2340
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6337 2809
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	697 625
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30243 11008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.958 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1070.209 828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.94 2.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.457 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	436.958 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 17597

Compare specifications (specs)