AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W5100
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD FirePro W4300 und AMD FirePro W5100 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FirePro W4300
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 531
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.153 vs 57.354
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3688
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3356
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3688
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3356
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 December 2015 vs 31 March 2014 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 531 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 vs 57.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 vs 3356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FirePro W5100
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2978 vs 2798
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11724 vs 11008
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 31.528
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 828.57
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 2.986
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 152.484
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 vs 3572
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 vs 3572
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2978 vs 2798 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11724 vs 11008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.15 vs 31.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 vs 828.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.199 vs 2.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.258 vs 152.484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4397 vs 3572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4397 vs 3572 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 | 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11008 | 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.528 | 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 | 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.986 | 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 | 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 152.484 | 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3572 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3572 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 | 3356 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Codename | Bonaire | Bonaire |
Startdatum | 1 December 2015 | 31 March 2014 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 435 | 627 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 930 MHz | 930 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,428 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | 768 |
Texturfüllrate | 44.64 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 4 | |
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HD сomponent Videoausgang | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 171 mm | 171 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Formfaktor | Full Height / Half Length | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 96 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 6000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |