AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon HD 8830M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4300 and AMD Radeon HD 8830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 44.64 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3572 vs 2695
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 5106
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 11302
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3572 vs 2695
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 5106
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 11302
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 December 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3572 vs 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 vs 5106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 vs 11302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3572 vs 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 vs 5106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 vs 11302 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8830M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD Radeon HD 8830M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11008 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.528 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.986 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 152.484 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3572 | 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 | 5106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 | 11302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3572 | 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 | 5106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 | 11302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD Radeon HD 8830M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Bonaire | Venus |
| Launch date | 1 December 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 435 | 437 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Boost clock speed | 575 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |

