AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 864.402
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 40.457
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 84.186

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 512
• 1981.7x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 2690
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 476
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 11610
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 33.507
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 3.064
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 4485
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 940
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2158
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 4485
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 940
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2158
• 13.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 4803
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 532
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 14261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 37.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 864.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 3.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 40.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 84.186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 1659

Compare specifications (specs)