AMD Radeon RX 550 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 864.402
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 40.457
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 84.186
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 25 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 84.186 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 94.1 billion / sec versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 512
- 1981.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,378 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 versus 2690
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 476
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 versus 11610
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 versus 33.507
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 versus 3.064
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 versus 4485
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2158
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 versus 4485
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2158
- 13.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 versus 127
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 94.1 billion / sec versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 versus 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 versus 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 versus 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 versus 3.064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 versus 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 versus 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 versus 127 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 4803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 14261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 3.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 84.186 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 6927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 6927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 1659 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Lexa | GK104 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 25 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | $249 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 576 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | $249.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | 23.69 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 2,378 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 170 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |