AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 14119
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 vs 746
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100473 vs 71402
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 217.04
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 3119.736
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 vs 21.707
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 133.975
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 1141.283
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 7442
- 7.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 6714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 7442
- 7.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 6714
- Around 96% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2435 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 vs 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 vs 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 vs 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 3119.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 vs 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 6714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 15315
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 15315
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 15315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 15315 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 | 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 3119.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 6714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 | 1242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 22 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 51 | 161 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 229 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |