NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 7881
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 564
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 39165
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 134.765
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 vs 1316.075
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 vs 8.799
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 vs 94.915
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 vs 573.418
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 10959
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 10959
• Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 352 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10180 7881
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	751 564
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55838 39165
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.014 134.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961.932 1316.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.169 8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.29 94.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	787.025 573.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	352 305

Compare specifications (specs)