NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 497.7x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55744 vs 55425
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 150.103
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 vs 27.417
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 11173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3690
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 11173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55744 vs 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 vs 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 vs 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15560 vs 10165
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 750
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 1961.932
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 11.169
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 787.025
- 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1557 vs 357
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15560 vs 10165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 vs 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 vs 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 787.025 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1557 vs 357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10165 | 15560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55744 | 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 357 | 1557 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP104 |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 286 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | 2-slot |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |