NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 versus 7881
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 versus 564
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 versus 39165
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 134.765
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 versus 1316.075
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 versus 8.799
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 versus 94.915
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 versus 573.418
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 10959
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 10959
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 352 versus 305
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 30 April 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 versus 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 versus 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 versus 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 versus 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 versus 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 versus 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 versus 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 versus 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 versus 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 versus 10959 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 352 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 | 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 | 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 352 | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU107 |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 283 | 376 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
ATIFirePro RG220
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 485M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 290X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
