NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 39165
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 134.765
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 1316.075
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 8.799
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 94.915
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 573.418
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 10959
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3358
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 10959
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3358
• 12x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 7539
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 7881
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 564
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 39165
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 134.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 1316.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 94.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 573.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 305

Compare specifications (specs)