NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 514.3x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 275 Watt
• Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1050 MHz
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 114.288
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11675
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3706
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3350
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11675
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3706
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3350

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X

• 2.8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9416 vs 7532
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 825 vs 385
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 1844.67
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.947 vs 10.683
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 115.919
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 683.568 vs 644.054
• Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4242 vs 3658

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7532 9416
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	385 825
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 683.568
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3658 4242

Compare specifications (specs)