NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • 514.3x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 114.288
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11675
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3706
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3350
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11675
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3706
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3350
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1485 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate 95.04 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 275 Watt
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.899 vs 114.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180 vs 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8926 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8062 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180 vs 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8926 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8062 vs 3350

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X

  • 2.8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1024
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9416 vs 7540
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 385
  • Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 1844.67
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.947 vs 10.683
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 115.919
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 683.568 vs 644.054
  • Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4242 vs 3658
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2816 vs 1024
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9416 vs 7540
PassMark - G2D Mark 824 vs 385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2911.861 vs 1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.947 vs 10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 118.411 vs 115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 683.568 vs 644.054
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4242 vs 3658

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7540
9416
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
385
824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
151.899
114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1844.67
2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.683
10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
115.919
118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
644.054
683.568
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12180
11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8926
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8062
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12180
11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8926
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8062
3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3658
4242
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark 7540 9416
PassMark - G2D Mark 385 824
Geekbench - OpenCL 42105
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.899 114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1844.67 2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.683 10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 115.919 118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 644.054 683.568
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8926 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8062 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8926 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8062 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3658 4242

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon R9 390X

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 2.0
Code name TU117 Grenada
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 18 June 2015
Place in performance rating 289 291
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $429

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1485 MHz 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2816
Pixel fill rate 47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 95.04 GTexel/s 184.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 6,200 million
Compute units 44
Floating-point performance 5,914 gflops
Stream Processors 2816

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 384 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 512 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 1050 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore