NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

NVIDIA Quadro P5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1316 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 39352
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3719
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3357
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3719
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3357

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 21 February 2018
Core clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1316 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	41907 vs 39352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200

Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1485 MHz
2.9x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 12180
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 12180
Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6252 vs 3656

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz vs 1485 MHz
Texture fill rate	279.4 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2560 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15910 vs 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15910 vs 12180
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	6252 vs 3656

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41907

39352

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

15910

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

15910

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3357

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3656

6252

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro P5200
PassMark - G3D Mark	7539
PassMark - G2D Mark	380
Geekbench - OpenCL	41907	39352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1843.045
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.098
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180	15910
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180	15910
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3656	6252

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP104
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	21 February 2018
Place in performance rating	267	268
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1569 MHz
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1316 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)	279.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)	139.7 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS	8.940 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2560
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s	111.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s	279.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		Large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	230.4 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5