AMD A10-5800K versus AMD A8-5600K
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-5800K et AMD A8-5600K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-5800K
- Environ 8% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.2 GHz versus 3.9 GHz
- 2.7x plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1492 versus 1429
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2954 versus 2863
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 523 versus 488
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1469 versus 1366
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.484 versus 3.45
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1020 versus 807
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2453 versus 1596
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1020 versus 807
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2453 versus 1596
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 4.2 GHz versus 3.9 GHz |
Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) versus 192 KB |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1492 versus 1429 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2954 versus 2863 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 523 versus 488 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1469 versus 1366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.484 versus 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1020 versus 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1020 versus 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 versus 1596 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-5600K
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.085 versus 9.891
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.213 versus 0.206
- 19.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.539 versus 0.594
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6089 versus 5148
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6089 versus 5148
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.39 versus 4.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.085 versus 9.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 versus 0.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.539 versus 0.594 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6089 versus 5148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6089 versus 5148 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-5800K
CPU 2: AMD A8-5600K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-5800K | AMD A8-5600K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1492 | 1429 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2954 | 2863 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 523 | 488 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1469 | 1366 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.37 | 4.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.891 | 11.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.206 | 0.213 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.594 | 11.539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.484 | 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1020 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5148 | 6089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1020 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5148 | 6089 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-5800K | AMD A8-5600K | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Trinity | Trinity |
Date de sortie | 26 September 2012 | 26 September 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $122 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1887 | 1753 |
Série | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
Cache L2 | 4096 KB | 4096 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
Fréquence maximale | 4.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 1303 Million | 1303 Million |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FM2 | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |