AMD A10-5800K vs AMD A8-5600K
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-5800K und AMD A8-5600K Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Kompatibilität, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-5800K
- Etwa 8% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- 2.7x mehr L1 Cache, mehr Daten können im L1 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1492 vs 1429
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2954 vs 2863
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 523 vs 488
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1469 vs 1366
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.484 vs 3.45
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1020 vs 807
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2453 vs 1596
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1020 vs 807
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2453 vs 1596
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 192 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1492 vs 1429 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2954 vs 2863 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 523 vs 488 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1469 vs 1366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.484 vs 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1020 vs 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1020 vs 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 vs 1596 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-5600K
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.085 vs 9.891
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.213 vs 0.206
- 19.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.539 vs 0.594
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6089 vs 5148
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6089 vs 5148
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.39 vs 4.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.085 vs 9.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 vs 0.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.539 vs 0.594 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6089 vs 5148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6089 vs 5148 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-5800K
CPU 2: AMD A8-5600K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-5800K | AMD A8-5600K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1492 | 1429 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2954 | 2863 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 523 | 488 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1469 | 1366 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.37 | 4.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.891 | 11.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.206 | 0.213 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.594 | 11.539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.484 | 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1020 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5148 | 6089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1020 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5148 | 6089 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD A10-5800K | AMD A8-5600K | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Trinity | Trinity |
Startdatum | 26 September 2012 | 26 September 2012 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $122 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1887 | 1753 |
Serie | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 246 mm |
L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
L2 Cache | 4096 KB | 4096 KB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1303 Million | 1303 Million |
Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
Unterstützte Sockel | FM2 | FM2 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |