AMD A8-6410 versus AMD A6-5200
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A8-6410 et AMD A6-5200 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-6410
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 25 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 783 versus 664
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1771 versus 1665
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 252 versus 224
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 749 versus 703
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 685 versus 549
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3853 versus 3036
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 685 versus 549
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3853 versus 3036
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2014 versus 23 May 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 25 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 783 versus 664 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1771 versus 1665 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 252 versus 224 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 749 versus 703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 685 versus 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3853 versus 3036 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 685 versus 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3853 versus 3036 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-5200
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.512 versus 2.344
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.259 versus 5.959
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.156 versus 0.121
- 19.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.377 versus 0.331
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.954 versus 1.59
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1223 versus 1097
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1223 versus 1097
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.512 versus 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.259 versus 5.959 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.156 versus 0.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.377 versus 0.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.954 versus 1.59 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1223 versus 1097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1223 versus 1097 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A8-6410
CPU 2: AMD A6-5200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A8-6410 | AMD A6-5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 783 | 664 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1771 | 1665 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 252 | 224 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 749 | 703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.344 | 2.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.959 | 8.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.121 | 0.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.331 | 6.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.59 | 1.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 685 | 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1097 | 1223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3853 | 3036 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 685 | 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1097 | 1223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3853 | 3036 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A8-6410 | AMD A6-5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Beema | Kabini |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM6410ITJ44JB | AM5200IAJ44HMD |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2469 | 2481 |
| Série | AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Desktop |
| OPN PIB | ||
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.4 GHz | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 930 Million | 1178 million |
| Ouvert | ||
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 90 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 1 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 847 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8400 |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 128 | |
| Nombre de pipelines | 128 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FT3b | FT3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A8-6410 avec des autres
AMDA8-6410 vs
AMDTurion X2 Ultra ZM-85
AMDA8-6410 vs
AMDAthlon II M340
AMDA8-6410 vs
IntelCore i3-2310E
AMDA8-6410 vs
AMDA6-5200
AMDA8-6410 vs
IntelCeleron G1820TE
AMDA8-6410 vs
IntelAtom x6214RE
