AMD A8-6410 vs AMD A6-5200
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A8-6410 und AMD A6-5200 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-6410
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 783 vs 664
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1772 vs 1663
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 252 vs 224
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 749 vs 703
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 685 vs 549
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3853 vs 3036
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 685 vs 549
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3853 vs 3036
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 June 2014 vs 23 May 2013 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 783 vs 664 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1772 vs 1663 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 252 vs 224 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 749 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 685 vs 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3853 vs 3036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 685 vs 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3853 vs 3036 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A6-5200
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.512 vs 2.344
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.259 vs 5.959
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.156 vs 0.121
- 19.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.377 vs 0.331
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.954 vs 1.59
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1223 vs 1097
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1223 vs 1097
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.512 vs 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.259 vs 5.959 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.156 vs 0.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.377 vs 0.331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.954 vs 1.59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1223 vs 1097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1223 vs 1097 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A8-6410
CPU 2: AMD A6-5200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-6410 | AMD A6-5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 783 | 664 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1772 | 1663 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 252 | 224 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 749 | 703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.344 | 2.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.959 | 8.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.121 | 0.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.331 | 6.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.59 | 1.954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 685 | 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1097 | 1223 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3853 | 3036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 685 | 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1097 | 1223 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3853 | 3036 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD A8-6410 | AMD A6-5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Beema | Kabini |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Startdatum | 1 June 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
OPN Tray | AM6410ITJ44JB | AM5200IAJ44HMD |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2471 | 2484 |
Serie | AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops |
Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Desktop |
OPN PIB | ||
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 2.4 GHz | |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 930 Million | 1178 million |
Freigegeben | ||
Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
L1 Cache | 256 KB | |
Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 90 °C | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 1 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L | DDR3 |
Grafik |
||
Enduro | ||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 847 MHz | 600 MHz |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8400 |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
iGPU Kernzahl | 128 | |
Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 128 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Unterstützte Sockel | FT3b | FT3 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |