AMD C-60 versus AMD E-350

Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD C-60 et AMD E-350 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD C-60

versus

AMD E-350

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD C-60

CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 9 Watt versus 18 Watt

Date de sortie	22 August 2011 versus 9 November 2010
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	9 Watt versus 18 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD E-350

Environ 20% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 1.6 GHz versus 1.33 GHz
Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 487 versus 354
Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 425 versus 290
Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 135 versus 108
Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 250 versus 197
Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.522 versus 0.467
Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1.936 versus 1.102
Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.036 versus 0.03
Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.275 versus 1.801
Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 0.725 versus 0.487
24.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 244 versus 10
Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 887 versus 564
24.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 244 versus 10
Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 887 versus 564

Caractéristiques
Fréquence maximale	1.6 GHz versus 1.33 GHz
Référence
PassMark - Single thread mark	487 versus 354
PassMark - CPU mark	425 versus 290
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	135 versus 108
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	250 versus 197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	0.522 versus 0.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1.936 versus 1.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.036 versus 0.03
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.275 versus 1.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	0.725 versus 0.487
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	244 versus 10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	887 versus 564
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	244 versus 10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	887 versus 564

Comparer les références

CPU 1: AMD C-60
CPU 2: AMD E-350

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

354

487

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

290

425

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

108

135

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

197

250

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.467

0.522

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.102

1.936

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.03

0.036

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.801

2.275

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.487

0.725

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

244

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

564

887

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

244

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

564

887

Nom	AMD C-60	AMD E-350
PassMark - Single thread mark	354	487
PassMark - CPU mark	290	425
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	108	135
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	197	250
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	0.467	0.522
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1.102	1.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.03	0.036
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	1.801	2.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	0.487	0.725
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10	244
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	564	887
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10	244
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	564	887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1798
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1798

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD C-60	AMD E-350
Essentiel
Nom de code de l’architecture	Ontario	Zacate
Date de sortie	22 August 2011	9 November 2010
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	3286	3015
Série	AMD C-Series	AMD E-Series
Segment vertical	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
Soutien de 64-bit
Taille de dé	75 mm	75 mm
Cache L1	128 KB	128 KB
Cache L2	1024 KB	1024 KB
Processus de fabrication	40 nm	40 nm
Fréquence maximale	1.33 GHz	1.6 GHz
Nombre de noyaux	2	2
Nombre de fils	2	2
Mémoire
Genres de mémoire soutenus	DDR3	DDR3
Compatibilité
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration	1	1
Prise courants soutenu	FT1 BGA 413-Ball	FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	9 Watt	18 Watt
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)