AMD E-300 versus AMD E-450
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E-300 et AMD E-450 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E-300
- 12.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.83 versus 0.395
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 versus 0.395 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E-450
- Environ 27% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 1.65 GHz versus 1.3 GHz
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 498 versus 394
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 437 versus 340
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 124 versus 104
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 226 versus 186
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.512 versus 0.502
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 296 versus 250
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 984 versus 754
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2135 versus 1461
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 296 versus 250
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 984 versus 754
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2135 versus 1461
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.65 GHz versus 1.3 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 498 versus 394 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 437 versus 340 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 124 versus 104 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 226 versus 186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.512 versus 0.502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 versus 250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 984 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2135 versus 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 versus 250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 984 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2135 versus 1461 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD E-450
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD E-300 | AMD E-450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 394 | 498 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 340 | 437 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 104 | 124 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 186 | 226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.502 | 0.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 | 0.395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 | 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1461 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 | 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1461 | 2135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.037 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.716 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD E-300 | AMD E-450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Zacate | Zacate |
| Date de sortie | 22 August 2011 | 22 August 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3002 | 2892 |
| Série | AMD E-Series | AMD E-Series |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Taille de dé | 75 mm | 75 mm |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.3 GHz | 1.65 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD E-300 avec des autres
AMDE-300 vs
AMDTurion 64 MT-37
AMDE-300 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T3000
AMDE-300 vs
AMDE-350
AMDE-300 vs
IntelAtom E3845
AMDE-300 vs
IntelCeleron 807UE
AMDE-300 vs
AMDGX-217GA
