AMD E-300 versus AMD E-350
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E-300 et AMD E-350 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E-300
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.83 versus 0.725
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 250 versus 244
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 250 versus 244
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 August 2011 versus 9 November 2010 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 versus 0.725 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 versus 244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 versus 244 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E-350
- Environ 23% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 1.6 GHz versus 1.3 GHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 485 versus 394
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 421 versus 339
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 135 versus 104
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 250 versus 186
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.522 versus 0.502
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 887 versus 754
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1798 versus 1461
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 887 versus 754
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1798 versus 1461
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.6 GHz versus 1.3 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 485 versus 394 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 421 versus 339 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 135 versus 104 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 250 versus 186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 versus 0.502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1798 versus 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1798 versus 1461 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD E-350
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD E-300 | AMD E-350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 394 | 485 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 339 | 421 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 104 | 135 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 186 | 250 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.502 | 0.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 | 0.725 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 | 244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1461 | 1798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 | 244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1461 | 1798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.036 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.275 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD E-300 | AMD E-350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Zacate | Zacate |
| Date de sortie | 22 August 2011 | 9 November 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3002 | 3004 |
| Série | AMD E-Series | AMD E-Series |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Taille de dé | 75 mm | 75 mm |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD E-300 avec des autres
AMDE-300 vs
AMDTurion 64 MT-37
AMDE-300 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T3000
AMDE-300 vs
AMDE-350
AMDE-300 vs
IntelAtom E3845
AMDE-300 vs
IntelCeleron 807UE
AMDE-300 vs
AMDGX-217GA
