AMD PRO A10-9700E versus Intel Core i5-6600
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A10-9700E et Intel Core i5-6600 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-9700E
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 90°C versus 71°C
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 86% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.113 versus 3.986
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 248.331 versus 80.569
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.246 versus 0.474
- 10.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.505 versus 2.385
- 11.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.999 versus 6.293
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 versus July 2015 |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C versus 71°C |
Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 256 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 versus 3.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 versus 80.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 versus 0.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 versus 2.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 versus 6.293 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-6600
- Environ 11% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.90 GHz versus 3.5 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2259 versus 1418
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6055 versus 2985
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 966 versus 493
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3168 versus 1490
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1717 versus 1158
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3511 versus 1368
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6275 versus 4350
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1717 versus 1158
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3511 versus 1368
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6275 versus 4350
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.90 GHz versus 3.5 GHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2259 versus 1418 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6055 versus 2985 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 966 versus 493 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3168 versus 1490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1717 versus 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3511 versus 1368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6275 versus 4350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1717 versus 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3511 versus 1368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6275 versus 4350 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-9700E
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD PRO A10-9700E | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1418 | 2259 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2985 | 6055 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | 966 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1490 | 3168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 | 3.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 | 80.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 | 0.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 | 2.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 | 6.293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1158 | 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1368 | 3511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 | 6275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1158 | 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1368 | 3511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 | 6275 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3405 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD PRO A10-9700E | Intel Core i5-6600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | July 2015 |
OPN Tray | AD970BAHM44AB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1245 | 1250 |
Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Nom de code de l’architecture | Skylake | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $230 | |
Prix maintenant | $219.99 | |
Processor Number | i5-6600 | |
Status | Launched | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.40 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 71°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Ouvert | ||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
Taille de dé | 177 mm | |
Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | |
Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 847 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
Graphiques du processeur | R7 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Device ID | 0x1912 | |
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | FCLGA1151 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD Secure technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Idle States | ||
Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | |
Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot |