Intel Core i5-5675C versus AMD PRO A10-9700E
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-5675C et AMD PRO A10-9700E pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-5675C
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.60 GHz versus 3.5 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2211 versus 1438
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 5714 versus 3027
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 989 versus 493
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3577 versus 1490
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3147 versus 1158
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3649 versus 1368
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3147 versus 1158
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3649 versus 1368
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.60 GHz versus 3.5 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2211 versus 1438 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5714 versus 3027 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 versus 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 versus 1490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 versus 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 versus 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 versus 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 versus 1368 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-9700E
- Environ 86% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.113 versus 3.323
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 248.331 versus 75.856
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.246 versus 0.432
- 40.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.505 versus 0.601
- 11.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.999 versus 6.401
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4350 versus 3360
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4350 versus 3360
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 versus 3.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 versus 75.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 versus 0.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 versus 0.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 versus 6.401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5675C
CPU 2: AMD PRO A10-9700E
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2211 | 1438 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5714 | 3027 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 | 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 | 1490 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.323 | 15.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.856 | 248.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.432 | 1.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 | 24.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.401 | 74.999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 | 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 4350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 | 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 4350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD PRO A10-9700E | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Broadwell | |
| Date de sortie | Q2'15 | 3 October 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1273 | 1246 |
| Processor Number | i5-5675C | |
| Série | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AD970BAHM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.60 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | R7 |
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 847 MHz | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-5675C avec des autres
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-4770S
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDPRO A6-8550B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-9700KF
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCeleron G4950
