AMD PRO A10-9700E vs Intel Core i5-6600
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A10-9700E und Intel Core i5-6600 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafik-Bildqualität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A10-9700E
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 27% höhere Kerntemperatur: 90°C vs 71°C
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 86% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.113 vs 3.986
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 248.331 vs 80.569
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.246 vs 0.474
- 10.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.505 vs 2.385
- 11.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.999 vs 6.293
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 3 October 2016 vs July 2015 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C vs 71°C |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 vs 3.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 vs 80.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 vs 0.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 vs 2.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 vs 6.293 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-6600
- Etwa 11% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.90 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2259 vs 1418
- 2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6055 vs 2985
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 966 vs 493
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3168 vs 1490
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1717 vs 1158
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3511 vs 1368
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6275 vs 4350
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1717 vs 1158
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3511 vs 1368
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6275 vs 4350
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.90 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2259 vs 1418 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6055 vs 2985 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 966 vs 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3168 vs 1490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1717 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3511 vs 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6275 vs 4350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1717 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3511 vs 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6275 vs 4350 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-9700E
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A10-9700E | Intel Core i5-6600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1418 | 2259 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2985 | 6055 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | 966 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1490 | 3168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 | 3.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 | 80.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 | 0.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 | 2.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 | 6.293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1158 | 1717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1368 | 3511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 | 6275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1158 | 1717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1368 | 3511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 | 6275 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3405 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD PRO A10-9700E | Intel Core i5-6600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Startdatum | 3 October 2016 | July 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AD970BAHM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1245 | 1250 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Skylake | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $230 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $219.99 | |
| Processor Number | i5-6600 | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 10.40 | |
Leistung |
||
| Base frequency | 3 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 71°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.5 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Matrizengröße | 177 mm | |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 847 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x1912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 64 GB | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | N / A | |
| Maximale Auflösung über WiDi | 1080p | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD PRO A10-9700E mit anderen
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDA10-6790K
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelCore i5-6600
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelCore i3-8300T
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500X
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelPentium Gold G5600T
