AMD PRO A8-9600 versus AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A8-9600 et AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A8-9600
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 7 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 45 nm
- Environ 92% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.191 versus 3.576
- 18.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 269.509 versus 14.5
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.523 versus 0.212
- 70.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.695 versus 0.394
- 20.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.399 versus 4.125
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 versus April 2009 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.191 versus 3.576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 269.509 versus 14.5 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.523 versus 0.212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.695 versus 0.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.399 versus 4.125 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A8-9600
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A8-9600 | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1509 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.191 | 3.576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 269.509 | 14.5 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.523 | 0.212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.695 | 0.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.399 | 4.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1299 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1377 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1299 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1377 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4551 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A8-9600 | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | April 2009 |
| OPN Tray | AD960BAGM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 999 | 3280 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Desktops | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Deneb | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Taille de dé | 258 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Compte de transistor | 758 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 900 MHz | |
| Graphiques du processeur | R7 | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A8-9600 avec des autres
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
AMDA12-9800
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2600
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
AMDPRO A10-8750B
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
IntelPentium G2140
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
IntelPentium Gold G6600
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
IntelPentium Gold G7400T
