Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 et Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 378 versus 369
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 January 2009 versus 15 July 2008 |
Cache L2 | 6144 KB versus 6134 KB |
Référence | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 378 versus 369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.515 versus 0.514 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.8 GHz versus 2.66 GHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1111 versus 1072
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1078 versus 989
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 658 versus 645
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.299 versus 0.282
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 22.781 versus 21.914
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.092 versus 0.081
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.117 versus 2.038
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 2.8 GHz versus 2.66 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 versus 1072 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1078 versus 989 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 658 versus 645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.299 versus 0.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.781 versus 21.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 versus 0.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.117 versus 2.038 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1072 | 1111 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 989 | 1078 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 378 | 369 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 645 | 658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.282 | 0.299 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.914 | 22.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.081 | 0.092 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.515 | 0.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.038 | 2.117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
Date de sortie | 1 January 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $316 | $316 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3139 | 3132 |
Prix maintenant | $298.95 | $89.95 |
Processor Number | T9550 | T9600 |
Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.78 | 6.31 |
Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
Cache L2 | 6144 KB | 6134 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105°C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.212V | 1.05V-1.2125V |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Prise courants soutenu | BGA479, PGA478 | BGA479, PGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |