Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 et Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2156 versus 1206
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1222 versus 738
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.676 versus 0.33
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.138 versus 0.099
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.248 versus 0.68
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.253 versus 2.408
Caractéristiques | |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2156 versus 1206 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1222 versus 738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.676 versus 0.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 versus 0.099 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 versus 0.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.253 versus 2.408 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
- Environ 1% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 72.4°C versus 71.4°C
- Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 95 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1237 versus 1185
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 versus 382
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 versus 24.212
Caractéristiques | |
Température de noyau maximale | 72.4°C versus 71.4°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 95 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1237 versus 1185 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 422 versus 382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.311 versus 24.212 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1185 | 1237 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2156 | 1206 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 | 422 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1222 | 738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.676 | 0.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.212 | 26.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.099 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 | 0.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.253 | 2.408 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2400 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Wolfdale |
Date de sortie | Q3'09 | January 2008 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2975 | 2971 |
Processor Number | Q9505 | E8400 |
Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $129.95 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 4.87 | |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Taille de dé | 164 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | 72.4°C |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 456 million | 410 million |
Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
Cache L2 | 6144 KB | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Fréquence maximale | 3 GHz | |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Mémoire |
||
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |