Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 versus Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 et Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1216 versus 1142
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2338 versus 2067
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 versus 362
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1299 versus 1139
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 versus 20.494
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 versus 0.171
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 versus 1142 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2338 versus 2067 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 versus 362 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 versus 1139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 versus 0.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 versus 20.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 versus 0.171 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.4 versus 1.258
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.93 versus 4.476
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.4 versus 1.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.93 versus 4.476 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 | 1142 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2338 | 2067 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 362 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 1139 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 0.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 20.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 1.4 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 4.93 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
| Date de sortie | Q1'08 | April 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3016 | 3008 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | Q8400 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $99.50 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.38 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 214 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | 71.4°C |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 820 million | 456 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 4096 KB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.67 GHz | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6300
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 640
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1850
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1800
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDA4-4020
