Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 versus Intel Pentium G620
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 et Intel Pentium G620 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Périphériques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 3% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 71.4°C versus 69.1°C
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1220 versus 1181
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2348 versus 1213
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1299 versus 832
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 versus 26.661
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 versus 0.174
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.258 versus 0.831
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 versus 1.599
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C versus 69.1°C |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1220 versus 1181 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2348 versus 1213 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 versus 832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 versus 26.661 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 versus 0.174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 versus 0.831 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 versus 1.599 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium G620
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 32 nm versus 45 nm
- Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 95 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 458 versus 412
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.11 versus 0.612
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 32 nm versus 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 95 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 458 versus 412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.11 versus 0.612 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: Intel Pentium G620
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Pentium G620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1220 | 1181 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2348 | 1213 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 458 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 832 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 1.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 26.661 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 0.831 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 1.599 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Pentium G620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Sandy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | Q1'08 | May 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3015 | 3003 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | G620 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $60 | |
| Prix maintenant | $24.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.01 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 214 mm2 | 131 mm |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | 69.1°C |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 820 million | 504 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.6 GHz | |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 17 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 1066 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.1 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 2 | |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6300
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 640
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1850
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1800
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDA4-4020
