Intel Core M-5Y10c versus Intel Celeron 2957U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core M-5Y10c et Intel Celeron 2957U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core M-5Y10c
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 43% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.00 GHz versus 1.4 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 2x plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 4.5 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1111 versus 780
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1892 versus 855
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.294 versus 6.97
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.247 versus 4.97
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 14.666 versus 5.777
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 857 versus 524
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 857 versus 524
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 December 2014 versus 1 January 2014 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.00 GHz versus 1.4 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 versus 780 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1892 versus 855 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 versus 6.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 versus 4.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 versus 5.777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 versus 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 versus 524 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron 2957U
- Environ 5% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 95 °C
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.823 versus 99.709
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1874 versus 1613
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 versus 2750
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1874 versus 1613
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 versus 2750
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 95 °C |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.823 versus 99.709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1874 versus 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 versus 2750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1874 versus 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 versus 2750 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core M-5Y10c
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2957U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 | 780 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1892 | 855 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 471 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 981 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 | 6.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 | 107.823 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 | 4.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 | 5.777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2750 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2750 | 3071 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Celeron 2957U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Broadwell | Haswell |
| Date de sortie | 1 December 2014 | 1 January 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $281 | $107 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1968 | 1970 |
| Prix maintenant | $281 | |
| Processor Number | 5Y10c | 2957U |
| Série | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 2.95 | |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 800 MHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 82 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 95 °C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.00 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 1300 Million | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x161E | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 1 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 16 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 6 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 30mm x 16.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3.5 W | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1234 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 12 | 10 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 |
| IDE integré | ||
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Nombre des ports USB | 4 | |
| Soutien de PCI | ||
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Technologie Intel® Active Management (AMT) | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core M-5Y10c avec des autres
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCeleron 2957U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCore i5-4278U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCore i5-7300U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDR-272F
