Intel Core i3-3245 versus AMD A8-5500
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i3-3245 et AMD A8-5500 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-3245
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 32 nm
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1770 versus 1334
- 6.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 3130 versus 455
- 4.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 6009 versus 1243
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 41.214 versus 8.685
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.279 versus 0.185
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.092 versus 0.504
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1770 versus 1334 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3130 versus 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 6009 versus 1243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 41.214 versus 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.279 versus 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.092 versus 0.504 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-5500
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2609 versus 2373
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.063 versus 2.296
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.038 versus 2.875
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4729 versus 1460
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4729 versus 1460
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2609 versus 2373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.063 versus 2.296 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.038 versus 2.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4729 versus 1460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4729 versus 1460 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-3245
CPU 2: AMD A8-5500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i3-3245 | AMD A8-5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1770 | 1334 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2373 | 2609 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3130 | 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 6009 | 1243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.296 | 4.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 41.214 | 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.279 | 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.092 | 0.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.875 | 3.038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1460 | 4729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1460 | 4729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 789 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 789 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i3-3245 | AMD A8-5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | Trinity |
| Date de sortie | Q2'13 | October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1940 | 1953 |
| Processor Number | i3-3245 | |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.40 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 65.3°C | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB (per core) | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1155 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i3-3245 avec des autres
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
IntelCore i5-3450S
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
AMDA8-5500
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
IntelCore i3-4330
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
IntelCeleron G4900
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
AMDA8-6500T
