Intel Core i3-3245 vs AMD A8-5500
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i3-3245 und AMD A8-5500 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-3245
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Etwa 18% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1770 vs 1334
- 6.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 3130 vs 455
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 6009 vs 1243
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 41.214 vs 8.685
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.279 vs 0.185
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.092 vs 0.504
| Spezifikationen | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1770 vs 1334 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3130 vs 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 6009 vs 1243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 41.214 vs 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.279 vs 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.092 vs 0.504 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-5500
- 2 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2610 vs 2373
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.063 vs 2.296
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.038 vs 2.875
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4729 vs 1460
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4729 vs 1460
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2610 vs 2373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.063 vs 2.296 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.038 vs 2.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4729 vs 1460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4729 vs 1460 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-3245
CPU 2: AMD A8-5500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-3245 | AMD A8-5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1770 | 1334 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2373 | 2610 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3130 | 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 6009 | 1243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.296 | 4.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 41.214 | 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.279 | 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.092 | 0.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.875 | 3.038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1460 | 4729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1460 | 4729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 789 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 789 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i3-3245 | AMD A8-5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Ivy Bridge | Trinity |
| Startdatum | Q2'13 | October 2012 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1940 | 1953 |
| Processor Number | i3-3245 | |
| Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.40 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 65.3°C | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB (per core) | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1155 | FM2 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i3-3245 mit anderen
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
IntelCore i5-3450S
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
AMDA8-5500
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
IntelCore i3-4330
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
IntelCeleron G4900
IntelCore i3-3245 vs
AMDA8-6500T
