Intel Core i7-7700T versus AMD A9-9400 SoC
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i7-7700T et AMD A9-9400 SoC pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-7700T
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 58% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.80 GHz versus 2.4 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2154 versus 1219
- 5.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 7619 versus 1346
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.684 versus 2.759
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 137.165 versus 49.738
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.414 versus 21.079
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1720 versus 894
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1720 versus 894
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | January 2017 versus May 2016 |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.80 GHz versus 2.4 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2154 versus 1219 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7619 versus 1346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.684 versus 2.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 137.165 versus 49.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.414 versus 21.079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1720 versus 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1720 versus 894 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9400 SoC
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 3.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.848 versus 5.444
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1799 versus 1660
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5100 versus 2953
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1799 versus 1660
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5100 versus 2953
| Caractéristiques | |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB (per core) versus 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 versus 5.444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1799 versus 1660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 versus 2953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1799 versus 1660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 versus 2953 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-7700T
CPU 2: AMD A9-9400 SoC
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i7-7700T | AMD A9-9400 SoC |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2154 | 1219 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7619 | 1346 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 916 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.684 | 2.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 137.165 | 49.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.444 | 11.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.414 | 21.079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1720 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1660 | 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2953 | 5100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1720 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1660 | 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2953 | 5100 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i7-7700T | AMD A9-9400 SoC | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaby Lake | Stoney Ridge |
| Date de sortie | January 2017 | May 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1463 | 1465 |
| Prix maintenant | $395.08 | |
| Processor Number | i7-7700T | |
| Série | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.83 | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | 74 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 80°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.80 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | |
| Taille de dé | 124 mm | |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x5912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.15 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 630 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 1.90 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1151 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015A (35W) | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i7-7700T avec des autres
IntelCore i7-7700T vs
AMDPhenom II X4 830
IntelCore i7-7700T vs
IntelCore i7-4790K
IntelCore i7-7700T vs
AMDA9-9400 SoC
IntelCore i7-7700T vs
IntelPentium G4620
IntelCore i7-7700T vs
IntelPentium Silver J5005
IntelCore i7-7700T vs
AMDA8-7500
