AMD FirePro D700 versus AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro D700 and AMD Radeon R9 M290X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D700
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 108.8 GTexel / s versus 72 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1280
- Environ 51% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,482 gflops versus 2,304 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5480 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25131 versus 23558
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 versus 51.022
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 versus 936.497
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 versus 5.62
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 versus 77.584
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 2581
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 2526
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 2581
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 2526
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s versus 72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops versus 2,304 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5480 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25131 versus 23558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 versus 51.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 versus 936.497 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 versus 5.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 versus 77.584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 2581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 2526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 2581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 2526 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 274 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6666 versus 6051
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6666 versus 6051
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 274 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 versus 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 versus 6051 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro D700 | AMD Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25131 | 23558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | 51.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | 936.497 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | 5.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 | 77.584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 | 6666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 2581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 2526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 | 6666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 2581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 2526 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3282 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.046 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro D700 | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | Neptune |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 | 9 January 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 591 | 592 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s | 72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 2,800 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 20 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 279 mm | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 263.0 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5480 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro D700 avec des autres
AMDFirePro D700 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
AMDFirePro D700 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4870
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
AMDFirePro D700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIAT1000
