AMD FirePro D700 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro D700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 108.8 GTexel / s versus 102.5 billion / sec
- Environ 52% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1344
- Environ 42% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,482 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 913.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5480 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25202 versus 15413
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 versus 41.613
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 versus 971.208
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 versus 4.281
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 versus 40.404
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3686
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3686
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 versus 10 May 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s versus 102.5 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1344 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5480 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25202 versus 15413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 versus 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 versus 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 versus 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 versus 40.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3686 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 61% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 274 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 6051
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 6051
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 274 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 versus 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 versus 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25202 | 15413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 | 40.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3361 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5331 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1814 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 | 10 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 564 | 566 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $474.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 279 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 263.0 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5480 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro D700 avec des autres
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
AMDFirePro D700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385X
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
AMDFirePro D700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
