AMD FirePro S4000X versus NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro S4000X and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S4000X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 725 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 83% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 992.0 gflops versus 542.2 gflops
- Environ 61% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 2800 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.089 versus 8.649
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 versus 174.555
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.08 versus 0.642
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.934 versus 11.732
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 versus 16.3
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2014 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 992.0 gflops versus 542.2 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 2800 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 versus 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 versus 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 versus 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 versus 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 versus 16.3 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S4000X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro S4000X | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 | 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 | 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 | 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 | 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 | 16.3 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3024 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro S4000X | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Venus | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1439 | 1442 |
Genre | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Prix maintenant | $79 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 992.0 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | MXM-A | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 44.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |