AMD Radeon 540 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 540 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 540
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 251 versus 217
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 versus 9740
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 251 versus 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 versus 9740 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- 1199.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- 416.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1000 or 2500 MHz versus 6 Gbps
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2581 versus 1383
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 2355
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 2355
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 versus 1726
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 versus 1726
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 or 2500 MHz versus 6 Gbps |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2581 versus 1383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 2355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 2355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 versus 1726 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 versus 1726 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 251 | 217 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1383 | 2581 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 9740 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 4148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 4148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | 4th Gen GCN | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Topaz | GM107 |
Conception | AMD Radeon 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 875 | 878 |
Genre | Notebook | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 8 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,439 gflops |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 914 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | 32 or 80 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6 Gbps | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized |