AMD Radeon HD 7790 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7790 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7790
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 778 MHz
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 56 GTexel / s versus 43.6 GTexel / s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 896 versus 336
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,792 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 85 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 4008 MHz
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 versus 1872
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 versus 418
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 versus 7872
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 versus 22.161
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 versus 781.734
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 versus 2.125
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 versus 47.218
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 versus 75.212
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 versus 3537
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 versus 3537
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 versus 24 September 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 778 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s versus 43.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 versus 336 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 4008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 versus 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 versus 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 versus 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 versus 22.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 versus 781.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 versus 2.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 versus 47.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 versus 75.212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 versus 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 versus 3537 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3398 versus 988
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3117 versus 2061
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3398 versus 988
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3117 versus 2061
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 versus 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 versus 2061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7790
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 | 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 | 22.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 | 781.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 | 2.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 | 47.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 | 75.212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 988 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2061 | 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 988 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2061 | 3117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Bonaire | GF114 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 | 24 September 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 837 | 840 |
Prix maintenant | $134.99 | $199.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.57 | 15.01 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 778 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s | 43.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 183 mm | 210 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 96.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |